Kimi K2.5 is Moonshot AI's most advanced language model, offering an exceptional 200K token context window — one of the longest available from any Chinese AI provider. It excels at long-document understanding, coding, and multilingual tasks, making it a strong competitor to DeepSeek V4 and GPT-4o.
In this guide, you'll learn everything about the Kimi K2.5 API: how to get started, pricing, code examples in Python and Node.js, and a direct comparison with other models.
Kimi K2.5 is developed by Moonshot AI, a leading Chinese AI research company. The model family includes:
Kimi K2.5 stands out for its exceptional long-context understanding, capable of processing entire books, lengthy codebases, and multi-turn conversations in a single session.
| Model | Input (per 1M tokens) | Output (per 1M tokens) | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2.5 | $0.55 | $1.80 | 200K |
| Moonshot V1 (128K) | $0.30 | $0.80 | 128K |
| Moonshot V1 (8K) | $0.30 | $0.80 | 8K |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro (for comparison) | $0.14 | $0.28 | 128K |
| GPT-4o (for comparison) | $2.50 | $10.00 | 128K |
💡 Key insight: While Kimi K2.5 is more expensive than DeepSeek V4 Pro ($0.55 vs $0.14 input), its 200K context window is unmatched for long-document tasks like legal contract analysis, academic paper review, and codebase understanding. For most general tasks, DeepSeek V4 Pro offers better value.
To access the Kimi K2.5 API, you can use AIWave — the only gateway that provides OpenAI-compatible access to Kimi models without requiring a Chinese phone number. Get $0.20 starter credit instantly.
→ Sign up at AIWave and grab your API key in under 2 minutes.
The Kimi K2.5 API is fully OpenAI-compatible. Use the standard SDK:
pip install openai
Or for Node.js:
npm install openai
Python Example — Long Document Analysis:
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://aiwave.live/v1",
api_key="***"
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="kimi-k2.5",
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": "You are an expert document analyst."},
{"role": "user", "content": "Analyze the key arguments in this 50-page legal document and provide a structured summary with key clauses, risks, and recommendations."}
],
max_tokens=4096
)
print(response.choices[0].message.content)
Node.js Example:
import OpenAI from 'openai';
const client = new OpenAI({
baseURL: 'https://aiwave.live/v1',
apiKey: '***'
});
const response = await client.chat.completions.create({
model: 'kimi-k2.5',
messages: [
{ role: 'system', content: 'You are a code review assistant.' },
{ role: 'user', content: 'Review this Python codebase for bugs and suggest improvements.' }
]
});
console.log(response.choices[0].message.content);
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://aiwave.live/v1",
api_key="***"
)
# Process a long document with streaming
with open("long_document.txt", "r") as f:
document = f.read()
stream = client.chat.completions.create(
model="kimi-k2.5",
messages=[
{"role": "user", "content": f"Summarize this document in bullet points:\n\n{document[:150000]}"}
],
stream=True
)
for chunk in stream:
if chunk.choices[0].delta.content:
print(chunk.choices[0].delta.content, end="")
Kimi K2.5's 200K context window is significantly larger than DeepSeek V4's 128K and GPT-4o's 128K. This makes it ideal for processing entire books, lengthy legal documents, comprehensive codebases, and extended customer support conversations.
Kimi K2.5 demonstrates competitive performance on programming tasks, particularly for Python, JavaScript, and Go. It excels at code review, refactoring, and generating documentation for large codebases.
While strong in English, Kimi K2.5 truly shines in Chinese language tasks — making it the go-to choice for developers building bilingual applications.
| Feature | Kimi K2.5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 200K 🏆 | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price (1M tokens) | $0.55 | $0.14 🏆 | $2.50 |
| Long-Document Processing | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🏆 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Coding | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Chinese Language | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🏆 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Reasoning | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| No Chinese Phone Required | ✅ AIWave | ✅ AIWave | N/A |
🎯 Recommendation: Use Kimi K2.5 when you need a 200K+ context window for long-document tasks. Use DeepSeek V4 Pro for general-purpose coding and reasoning at a lower cost. Both are available through the same AIWave API key.
One of the advantages of using AIWave is that you can access multiple models — including Kimi K2.5, DeepSeek V4, GLM-5, ERNIE 4.0 (Baidu), and Qwen — through a single API key. Simply change the model parameter:
# Switch between models with one parameter change
models = ["kimi-k2.5", "deepseek-v4-pro", "glm-5", "ernie-4.0"]
for model in models:
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model=model,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain your key features."}]
)
print(f"{model}: {response.choices[0].message.content[:50]}...")
The choice between Kimi K2.5 and DeepSeek V4 depends on your use case:
With AIWave, you don't have to choose — both are available under one API key, and you can switch between them by changing a single parameter.
Get $0.20 starter credit. No credit card. No Chinese phone number.
Get Your API Key →One API key for Kimi, DeepSeek, GLM, ERNIE, and 25+ models.
Kimi K2.5 is the latest model from Moonshot AI (月之暗面), a Beijing-based AI research company. It's their most advanced language model with a 200K context window.
Yes. AIWave provides access to Kimi K2.5 without requiring a Chinese phone number. Just sign up with your email and get $0.20 starter credit to start.
They excel in different areas. Kimi K2.5 has a larger context window (200K vs 128K) and better Chinese language ability. DeepSeek V4 Pro is more cost-effective ($0.14 vs $0.55/M input tokens) and has stronger reasoning capabilities.
Kimi K2.5 supports function calling and streaming, making it suitable for production applications. It's fully OpenAI-compatible through the AIWave API.
Kimi K2.5 is Moonshot AI's latest flagship, offering improved performance over the Moonshot V1 series. Moonshot V1 (8K and 128K variants) are older generation models available at a lower price point.
Related: Kimi K2.5 API guide · pricing
128K context. Vision. Reasoning. Kimi K2.5 on AIWave — $0.20 starter credits.
Explore Models →Moonshot AI ships two distinct lines, and confusing them is the most common source of unexpected
bills. The kimi-* models are the current flagship generation; the moonshot-v1-*
models are the earlier series, still served and considerably cheaper, with vision variants available.
Live rates, read from the pricing endpoint on 2026-07-26:
| Model ID | Input / 1M tokens | Output / 1M tokens |
|---|---|---|
kimi-k2.5 | $0.66 | $3.30 |
kimi-k3 | $4.50 | $22.50 |
moonshot-v1-32k | $0.95 | $2.85 |
moonshot-v1-32k-vision-preview | $1.15 | $3.45 |
moonshot-v1-8k | $0.3 | $2.20 |
moonshot-v1-8k-vision-preview | $0.3 | $2.30 |
Rates read from the AIWave pricing endpoint on 2026-07-26. Check live pricing before budgeting — providers revise rates.
moonshot-v1-8k
call that does the job costs a fraction of a kimi-k3 call that does the same job better than
it needed to.-vision-preview variants accept images; the others do not.
Check the model directory before building an interface around it.No Moonshot-specific SDK is required. Point the official OpenAI client at the gateway and use the model ID:
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(api_key="sk-YOUR_KEY", base_url="https://aiwave.live/v1")
resp = client.chat.completions.create(
model="kimi-k2.5",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": open("contract.txt").read()[:200000]}],
)
print(resp.usage) # check how much of that context you actually paid for
Print usage on long-context calls. Input tokens dominate the bill in document work, and
the difference between sending a whole file and sending the relevant section is usually an order of
magnitude. The API documentation covers the endpoint contract, and
live pricing always has current rates.
A large window makes it possible to skip retrieval, not always advisable. Sending 100,000 tokens on every query costs 100,000 tokens on every query, whereas retrieving the right 4,000 costs 4,000. Long context is the right tool when the whole document genuinely matters — contract review, codebase analysis, multi-document synthesis — and an expensive shortcut when it does not. The retrieval alternative is in building a production RAG pipeline.